Gold’s Asian Power Shift: Chinese Premiums Hold While Hong Kong Challenges Singapore’s Bullion Ambitions

The gold market is increasingly becoming a story about Asia. While much of the attention over the past several years has focused on central bank buying, geopolitical tensions, and interest rate expectations, another trend has been quietly developing beneath the surface: the race to become Asia’s dominant bullion hub.
Recent data shows that Chinese gold premiums remain positive, with gold trading approximately 0.24% above LBMA benchmarks. At the same time, Hong Kong is accelerating investments into its bullion ecosystem, attracting refiners, logistics providers, and major bullion banks as it seeks to strengthen its position as a regional gold trading center.
Taken together, these developments highlight an important reality. Gold is no longer simply a financial asset traded in London and New York. Increasingly, the center of gravity for physical demand, storage, refining, and distribution is shifting toward Asia.
The latest figures suggest that while short-term price momentum has moderated, the infrastructure supporting long-term gold demand continues to expand.
One of the most consistent indicators of physical demand is the relationship between Shanghai and London pricing.
Recent data shows gold continuing to trade at approximately 0.24% above LBMA benchmarks in China.
A positive premium means domestic buyers are willing to pay more than international reference prices to secure physical metal. While a 0.24% premium may appear modest compared with some of the double-digit premiums occasionally observed in silver markets, its persistence is significant.
Gold premiums have remained positive for much of the year despite elevated prices and periods of consolidation.
That resilience suggests that physical demand continues to absorb available supply rather than forcing sellers to discount metal into the market.
Unlike futures positioning or ETF flows, premiums reflect actual physical market conditions. As long as premiums remain positive, the market is generally signaling that demand remains healthy relative to local supply.
The more interesting development may not be price-related at all.
Hong Kong is now actively positioning itself to become a larger player in global bullion markets, expanding infrastructure across trading, refining, storage, and logistics.
Companies including SF Holding Co. and Point Gold International Ltd. are investing in the city, while major bullion banks such as JPMorgan and UBS are supporting the initiative.
This matters because bullion hubs compete for more than just vault storage. They compete for trading volumes, settlement activity, refining capacity, logistics flows, and ultimately market influence.
Historically, London has dominated global bullion clearing, while Singapore has spent the last decade establishing itself as Asia’s premier precious metals storage and distribution hub.
Hong Kong’s latest push suggests that the competitive landscape is evolving once again.
Gold markets ultimately require three things to function efficiently: trust, liquidity, and movement of physical metal.
Infrastructure investments support all three.
Refineries convert raw supply into marketable products. Vaults provide secure storage. Logistics networks move metal between buyers and sellers. Trading systems provide price discovery and settlement.
As more participants invest in these capabilities, the market becomes more efficient and potentially more attractive for institutional participation.
The significance of Hong Kong’s expansion is therefore not necessarily measured by immediate trading volumes. Rather, it reflects a long-term effort to strengthen its position within the global bullion ecosystem.
These investments are difficult and expensive to build, which is why they often signal long-term strategic intentions rather than short-term opportunities.
While headlines focus on Hong Kong’s ambitions, Singapore remains one of the most important bullion centers globally.
Singapore continues to benefit from political stability, strong legal protections, tax advantages for investment-grade precious metals, and a well-established network of vault operators and logistics providers.
The city-state has also spent years developing institutional relationships across the precious metals value chain.
The emergence of additional competitors does not necessarily weaken Singapore’s position. In many cases, larger regional ecosystems create more overall liquidity and more efficient price discovery.
Gold demand growth across Asia is substantial enough that multiple hubs can coexist and thrive simultaneously.
The key question is not whether Hong Kong replaces Singapore, but whether Asia collectively captures a larger share of global bullion activity over time.
The persistence of Chinese premiums provides another reminder of where physical demand remains concentrated.
Over the past several years, Asian buyers have increasingly become the marginal source of demand during periods of market uncertainty.
This trend extends beyond China. India continues to play a critical role in global gold consumption, while Southeast Asia has experienced growing interest in physical ownership and wealth preservation products.
As infrastructure expands across the region, the ability to source, store, refine, and distribute physical metal locally becomes increasingly important.
The result is a market where physical demand is gradually becoming more regionalized, even as pricing remains globally interconnected.
The combination of positive Chinese premiums and expanding bullion infrastructure presents an interesting picture of the current market.
Physical demand remains sufficiently strong to maintain premiums above international benchmarks.
At the same time, long-term investments in vaulting, refining, logistics, and settlement infrastructure continue across Asia.
Neither development points toward a market experiencing demand collapse.
Instead, both suggest a market that is becoming more mature and increasingly centered around Asian participation.
For bullion dealers, the most important trend may be the growing competition among Asian bullion hubs. Expanded infrastructure in Hong Kong alongside existing capabilities in Singapore could improve liquidity, increase distribution efficiency, and create new opportunities for physical market participants. Positive Chinese premiums also indicate that demand remains active despite elevated prices.
For conservative investors, the persistence of physical premiums provides reassurance that underlying demand remains intact. Infrastructure investments by major industry participants are typically made with multi-year horizons in mind and often reflect confidence in the long-term relevance of the asset class.
For traders, the near-term environment appears more balanced than earlier phases of the rally. Gold has spent recent weeks consolidating after substantial gains, and positive but modest premiums suggest steady rather than euphoric buying. The market appears increasingly driven by physical demand and regional flows rather than panic-driven speculation.
Looking further ahead, the long-term picture remains constructive. The continued buildout of bullion infrastructure across Asia, combined with persistent physical demand, suggests that gold is becoming more deeply embedded within regional financial systems. If that trend continues, periods of consolidation may prove temporary within a broader structural uptrend.
While short-term volatility will continue to be influenced by macroeconomic events, interest rates, and geopolitics, the expansion of Asia’s bullion ecosystem points toward a market whose foundations are becoming broader and more resilient. In that environment, sustained trading above the $4,500 per ounce region would not be surprising, while renewed demand growth could eventually support another challenge of the psychological $5,000 per ounce threshold over the longer term.
Hugo Pascal’s observation about the AU9999 contract hitting a 10-week volume high underscores the increasing significance of physical gold trading on the Shanghai Gold Exchange. This trend not only highlights robust domestic demand in China but also reflects broader shifts in the global gold market toward physical-backed assets.
Latest articles
Tool and strategies modern teams need to help their companies grow.
Invite users to stay updated with exclusive insights and market trends by subscribing to the newsletter.
InProved Pte. Ltd. (“InProved”, UEN 201602269C). InProved is regulated by the Ministry of Law (“Minlaw”) and holds a Precious Stones and Precious Metals license for dealing in bullion products (PSPM License PS20190001819). For additional legal and privacy related information related to InProved, please visit are terms and conditions.
Our products and services are only available to Accredited Investors. Investing in bullion involves risk, and there is always the potential of losing money. Certain bullion products are not suitable for all investors. The rate of return on investments can vary widely over time, especially for long-term investments. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Before investing, consider your investment objectives and any fees and expenses that may be charged by InProved and any third-party stakeholders. The content provided herein is for informational purposes only and is not investment or financial advice, tax or legal advice, an offer, solicitation of an offer, or advice to buy or sell or hold bullion products. This material has not been reviewed by the Minlaw.
Statements made are not facts, including statements regarding trends, market conditions and the experience or expertise of the author or quoted individual(s) are based on current expectations, estimates, opinions and/or beliefs. Opinions expressed by other members on InProved should not be viewed as investment recommendations from InProved. Endorsements were provided at the request of InProved. InProved is not affiliated with and does not purport to own or control any third-party content linked herein.
Copyright © 2026 InProved Pte Ltd (UEN 201616594C, PSPM license PS20190001819)