Gold’s Speculators Step Back While Physical Demand Holds Firm

Gold spent the week navigating a market increasingly defined by divergence rather than consensus. While overall speculative positioning continued to contract, the composition of that positioning tells a far more nuanced story. Managed Money quietly added to its net long exposure, producers reduced some of their forward selling, and China’s domestic premium edged higher despite continued macro uncertainty. At the same time, gold miners endured another wave of heavy selling as higher U.S. Treasury yields, a stronger U.S. dollar and persistent geopolitical uncertainty pressured the broader precious metals complex. Rather than signalling a collapse in gold’s long-term outlook, the latest positioning data suggests that weaker hands continue to exit while longer-term participants remain considerably more patient.
The latest Commitment of Traders data reveals that headline positioning only tells part of the story. Net speculative length across gold futures declined by 3.9% week-on-week, but the reduction was not driven by traditional speculative funds. Instead, Managed Money actually increased its net long position by 4.0%, while the sharp decline came almost entirely from the “Other Reportable” category, which reduced net exposure by 15.6%.
That distinction matters because different market participants often behave very differently during periods of uncertainty. Managed Money typically represents institutional investors and hedge funds with clearer macro views, whereas the Other Reportable category often captures shorter-term speculative capital. The latest figures therefore suggest that professional investors are not abandoning gold altogether. Instead, shorter-term participants are reducing exposure while institutional positioning remains comparatively resilient.
Another supportive development came from the producer community. Commercial producers trimmed portions of their short exposure during the week, reducing forward hedging activity. Since producer hedging effectively introduces additional selling pressure into the futures market, lower hedge volumes can remove one source of downward pressure on prices. While not a bullish catalyst on its own, it does contribute to a more balanced market structure.
The physical market continues to provide an important source of stability. China’s domestic gold premium increased modestly to around 0.14% above the LBMA benchmark, extending the gradual recovery seen over recent weeks. Although considerably smaller than the double-digit premiums regularly observed in silver, the continued willingness of Chinese buyers to pay above international benchmark prices suggests domestic demand remains healthy despite recent volatility.
The contrast with silver is also notable. While gold’s premium remains measured, silver continues trading at an elevated 11.52% premium over LBMA. The difference highlights the distinct drivers behind the two metals. Gold continues to behave primarily as a monetary asset responding to macroeconomic developments, whereas silver remains more heavily influenced by physical availability and industrial demand dynamics within China.
Activity on the Shanghai Futures Exchange points to a more cautious near-term outlook. Gold closed the session at 886 CNY per gram, equivalent to approximately US$4,061.79 per ounce on COMEX pricing, after declining 1.34% during the day. Beneath the price action, options positioning became increasingly defensive.
The Put-Call Volume Ratio (PCVR) climbed to 1.17, indicating stronger demand for downside protection during the session, even though the Put-Call Open Interest Ratio (PCOIR) remained relatively bullish at 0.62, suggesting that existing positioning is still dominated by calls. Market participants are also paying close attention to the 800 CNY/g strike, which has emerged as the primary downside support level should selling pressure intensify. Rather than aggressively betting against gold, options traders appear to be purchasing insurance while maintaining much of their longer-term bullish positioning.
Perhaps the weakest segment of the precious metals complex remains the mining sector. Sentiment indicators deteriorated further throughout the week as investors continued rotating capital away from resource equities. The firm’s Composite Sentiment Index fell sharply from 8.25 to 3.64, highlighting an accelerating deterioration in investor confidence.
Market breadth statistics paint an equally challenging picture. The overall Composite Index now stands at just 5, representing one of the weakest readings in almost four years. Only 6.5% of monitored mining stocks remain above their 20-day moving averages, while participation falls to 2.2% above the 50-day average and just 4.3% above the 200-day average. Such readings are consistent with broad-based capitulation rather than isolated weakness, reflecting indiscriminate selling across the sector.
Historically, these extremely depressed breadth readings have often occurred late rather than early in correction phases. While they do not guarantee an immediate reversal, they suggest that much of the selling pressure may already have been expressed through the mining equities.
Gold continues to struggle against two powerful macro headwinds that have limited investor conviction throughout recent months. The first is what many market participants have described as the “TACO effect,” where frequent shifts in geopolitical developments, tariff negotiations and policy headlines repeatedly interrupt emerging market trends before they can fully develop. Safe-haven demand rises briefly before quickly fading as headlines change.
The second is the continued rotation of global capital toward artificial intelligence infrastructure and related technology investments. With substantial investor capital flowing into AI-driven growth opportunities, precious metals have found themselves competing for attention against one of the strongest thematic investment cycles in decades.
These forces are reflected in positioning data. Total precious metals open interest has fallen to the 17th percentile over the past 52 weeks, with aggregate futures open interest sitting at approximately 548,100 contracts. Low participation does not necessarily indicate bearish conviction; instead, it often reflects widespread uncertainty, with many investors choosing to remain on the sidelines until a clearer macro narrative emerges.
For bullion dealers, physical demand continues to offer encouraging signs despite softer futures sentiment. China’s gold premium remains positive, producer hedging has eased, and institutional positioning has held up better than headline speculative data suggests. Dealers should continue monitoring Asian premiums and commercial hedging activity, as both provide valuable insight into underlying physical demand that is often obscured by short-term macro-driven price movements.
For conservative investors, the current environment increasingly resembles a period of consolidation rather than structural deterioration. Central bank buying remains supportive globally, physical demand in Asia continues to hold firm, and speculative positioning has become considerably cleaner than earlier in the year. While macro volatility may continue producing sharp price swings, gradual accumulation during periods of weakness remains a sensible strategy for investors focused on long-term portfolio diversification rather than short-term price movements.
For traders, the coming weeks are likely to remain dominated by U.S. dollar direction, Treasury yields and incoming macroeconomic data rather than precious-metals-specific news. The 800 CNY/g area on the SHFE remains the key technical support level, while sustained strength above 900–920 CNY/g would be needed to confirm that bullish momentum is rebuilding. In U.S. dollar terms, gold may continue consolidating between roughly US$3,950 and US$4,200 per ounce in the near term until participation returns. Looking further into the second half of 2026, if monetary policy begins to ease, geopolitical uncertainty persists and central bank purchases remain strong, a renewed advance toward the previous highs above US$4,400 per ounce remains a realistic longer-term scenario. The current environment appears less like the beginning of a bear market and more like an extended period of positioning reset before the market’s next major directional move.
Hugo Pascal’s observation about the AU9999 contract hitting a 10-week volume high underscores the increasing significance of physical gold trading on the Shanghai Gold Exchange. This trend not only highlights robust domestic demand in China but also reflects broader shifts in the global gold market toward physical-backed assets.
Latest articles
Tool and strategies modern teams need to help their companies grow.
Invite users to stay updated with exclusive insights and market trends by subscribing to the newsletter.
InProved Pte. Ltd. (“InProved”, UEN 201602269C). InProved is regulated by the Ministry of Law (“Minlaw”) and holds a Precious Stones and Precious Metals license for dealing in bullion products (PSPM License PS20190001819). For additional legal and privacy related information related to InProved, please visit are terms and conditions.
Our products and services are only available to Accredited Investors. Investing in bullion involves risk, and there is always the potential of losing money. Certain bullion products are not suitable for all investors. The rate of return on investments can vary widely over time, especially for long-term investments. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Before investing, consider your investment objectives and any fees and expenses that may be charged by InProved and any third-party stakeholders. The content provided herein is for informational purposes only and is not investment or financial advice, tax or legal advice, an offer, solicitation of an offer, or advice to buy or sell or hold bullion products. This material has not been reviewed by the Minlaw.
Statements made are not facts, including statements regarding trends, market conditions and the experience or expertise of the author or quoted individual(s) are based on current expectations, estimates, opinions and/or beliefs. Opinions expressed by other members on InProved should not be viewed as investment recommendations from InProved. Endorsements were provided at the request of InProved. InProved is not affiliated with and does not purport to own or control any third-party content linked herein.
Copyright © 2026 InProved Pte Ltd (UEN 201616594C, PSPM license PS20190001819)