Silver’s June Washout: ETF Outflows, Weak Seasonality, and a Market Searching for a Floor

Silver entered June facing a combination of macroeconomic pressure, deteriorating sentiment, and seasonal headwinds. A stronger-than-expected U.S. employment report reignited the “higher-for-longer” interest rate narrative, sending Treasury yields and the U.S. dollar higher while triggering a broad selloff across precious metals. The result was one of silver’s weakest weeks in recent months, with spot prices falling approximately 8% week-on-week and options markets becoming increasingly defensive.
Yet beneath the surface, the physical market remains far more resilient than the price action suggests. Chinese silver continues to trade at a premium of approximately 10% over LBMA benchmarks, SHFE inventories remain near multi-year highs despite a slight weekly outflow, and London vault inventories continue to grow modestly. At the same time, sentiment indicators, options positioning, and implied volatility metrics suggest that speculative participation has become increasingly pessimistic.
The current market therefore presents a fascinating contrast. Futures traders and options markets are preparing for further weakness, while physical markets continue showing signs of underlying demand. The question facing silver investors is whether the recent selloff represents the beginning of a larger downturn or the type of sentiment washout that often appears near important lows.
The immediate catalyst for silver’s decline was the latest U.S. non-farm payroll report. Job creation came in at 172,000 positions, exceeding market expectations and reinforcing concerns that inflationary pressures may remain more persistent than previously anticipated. The stronger labor market data pushed Treasury yields higher, strengthened the U.S. dollar, and reduced expectations for near-term interest rate cuts.
For silver, the consequences were severe. Unlike industrial commodities that can benefit directly from stronger economic growth, precious metals often struggle when real yields rise. The opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets increases, and dollar-denominated metals become more expensive for international buyers. This combination created what many traders described as a “bloodbath” across the precious metals complex, with gold, silver, and platinum all suffering meaningful declines.
Technical indicators reflected the speed of the move. Relative Strength Index readings moved into deeply oversold territory, suggesting that the market had become stretched on the downside. However, oversold conditions alone rarely reverse trends. The market’s attention has now shifted toward upcoming inflation data and Federal Reserve communications, both of which could determine whether the recent selloff extends further or begins to stabilize.
The latest London ETF data shows that institutional participation has weakened alongside prices. Physically-backed silver ETFs shed approximately 3.2 million ounces, equivalent to roughly 100 metric tons, over the reporting period. Total ETF holdings declined to approximately 20,456 tons, extending the broader pattern of investor caution that has emerged over recent weeks.
Despite these outflows, London’s overall silver market remains enormous. LBMA vault holdings now stand at approximately 27,611 tons, representing 74.1% of visible inventories. The estimated free float, which excludes ETF-held silver and represents metal more readily available for trading and settlement, increased to approximately 7,143 tons or 25.9% of total inventories.
This distinction is important because ETF outflows do not necessarily imply physical shortages or surpluses. Instead, they often reflect shifts in investor sentiment. The fact that free float inventories have been increasing suggests that available metal is becoming somewhat easier to source, even as investment demand has softened.
Seasonal patterns are never guarantees, but they often provide useful context when evaluating market behavior. Looking at the past 27 years of silver price performance, June stands out for the wrong reasons.
The metal has generated an average return of approximately -1.7% during the month and has recorded positive performance in only 9 out of the last 27 years, resulting in a win rate of just 33.3%. No other month in the annual calendar has consistently produced weaker average results.
The current decline therefore arrives during a period that has historically been challenging for silver. While seasonality alone cannot explain the recent weakness, it reinforces the broader risk-off environment currently affecting the market. Traders looking for a quick rebound must therefore contend not only with macroeconomic headwinds but also with a seasonal backdrop that has historically favored caution.
Perhaps the clearest sign of deteriorating sentiment comes from the options market.
Risk reversals have collapsed, with puts becoming more expensive than calls on SLV. In practical terms, investors are paying a premium for downside protection rather than upside participation. This shift reflects a market that is increasingly concerned about further losses rather than chasing additional gains.
The implied volatility structure tells a similar story. Fixed-strike implied volatility on key upside call options has been falling sharply. July $80 calls saw implied volatility decline from 61.5% to 48.1%, while August $80 calls dropped from 60.5% to 48.8%. If traders genuinely expected an imminent upside breakout, these volatility levels would typically be rising rather than falling.
The break below the widely watched $65 put wall in pre-market trading further reinforced bearish sentiment. Market makers who previously benefited from stabilizing flows around those levels may now be forced to adjust hedges in ways that amplify downside volatility.
Against this increasingly bearish backdrop, China’s physical silver market continues displaying resilience.
Silver premiums have compressed somewhat but remain elevated at approximately 10% above LBMA benchmarks. While lower than the extreme levels seen earlier in the year, a double-digit premium still suggests meaningful demand for physical metal relative to available supply.
SHFE inventories also tell an interesting story. Total stocks currently stand at approximately 972.6 tons, or 31.3 million ounces. Although inventories recorded a modest weekly outflow of 4.3 tons, the broader restocking trend remains intact. Following months of aggressive inventory rebuilding, a temporary pause or slowdown is not particularly surprising.
At the same time, SHFE silver futures continue trading around 17,700 CNY/kg, equivalent to approximately $81.30 per ounce on a COMEX-equivalent basis. Market structure remains in contango, indicating that immediate physical tightness has eased compared with the severe backwardation conditions seen earlier in the year.
Taken together, the Chinese market appears to be cooling rather than collapsing. Physical demand remains present, premiums remain positive, and inventory levels remain historically elevated relative to where they stood only a few months ago.
The current silver market is caught between two competing narratives.
On one side stands the macroeconomic story. Strong employment data, rising yields, a stronger dollar, weakening options sentiment, and seasonal headwinds all point toward continued caution. These factors have dominated short-term price action and explain much of the recent decline.
On the other side stands the physical market. Chinese premiums remain positive, SHFE inventories remain near the 1,000-ton threshold, and London free float inventories continue to represent only about one-quarter of total vaulted metal. These are not the characteristics of a market experiencing a collapse in underlying demand.
The result is a market that appears increasingly disconnected between physical fundamentals and speculative sentiment. Such divergences do not always resolve immediately, but they often become important once macroeconomic pressures begin to ease.
For bullion dealers, the most important takeaway is that physical demand continues to hold up better than paper market sentiment. Chinese premiums remain near 10%, SHFE inventories remain substantial, and London’s free float remains relatively limited compared with total vaulted holdings. The physical market is certainly softer than it was earlier in the year, but it has not entered a phase of oversupply.
For conservative investors, the current correction may be worth viewing through the lens of sentiment rather than fundamentals. ETF outflows, bearish options positioning, and deeply oversold technical indicators suggest that pessimism has become widespread. Historically, some of the most attractive long-term entry points in precious metals have emerged when sentiment becomes significantly more negative than the underlying physical market conditions justify.
For traders, the near-term battle will likely revolve around the $78–$82 per ounce range on a COMEX-equivalent basis. The 17,000 CNY/kg level on SHFE, equivalent to roughly $78 per ounce, remains an important floor that market participants continue to defend. A decisive break below that level could trigger additional algorithmic and dealer-driven selling. Conversely, stabilization above those levels combined with softer inflation data could create conditions for a meaningful rebound.
Looking further ahead, the longer-term outlook remains cautiously constructive. Chinese premiums remain elevated, global silver inventories remain concentrated within relatively few vault systems, and industrial demand trends tied to electrification and solar deployment have not disappeared. While the market may continue consolidating during the traditionally weak summer period, sustained trading below the high-$70s appears increasingly difficult to justify if physical demand remains intact. Under a more favorable macroeconomic environment, a return toward the $90–$100 per ounce region remains achievable over the longer term. For now, however, silver appears less focused on chasing new highs and more concerned with proving that a durable floor has finally been established.
Hugo Pascal’s observation about the AU9999 contract hitting a 10-week volume high underscores the increasing significance of physical gold trading on the Shanghai Gold Exchange. This trend not only highlights robust domestic demand in China but also reflects broader shifts in the global gold market toward physical-backed assets.
Latest articles
Tool and strategies modern teams need to help their companies grow.
Invite users to stay updated with exclusive insights and market trends by subscribing to the newsletter.
InProved Pte. Ltd. (“InProved”, UEN 201602269C). InProved is regulated by the Ministry of Law (“Minlaw”) and holds a Precious Stones and Precious Metals license for dealing in bullion products (PSPM License PS20190001819). For additional legal and privacy related information related to InProved, please visit are terms and conditions.
Our products and services are only available to Accredited Investors. Investing in bullion involves risk, and there is always the potential of losing money. Certain bullion products are not suitable for all investors. The rate of return on investments can vary widely over time, especially for long-term investments. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Before investing, consider your investment objectives and any fees and expenses that may be charged by InProved and any third-party stakeholders. The content provided herein is for informational purposes only and is not investment or financial advice, tax or legal advice, an offer, solicitation of an offer, or advice to buy or sell or hold bullion products. This material has not been reviewed by the Minlaw.
Statements made are not facts, including statements regarding trends, market conditions and the experience or expertise of the author or quoted individual(s) are based on current expectations, estimates, opinions and/or beliefs. Opinions expressed by other members on InProved should not be viewed as investment recommendations from InProved. Endorsements were provided at the request of InProved. InProved is not affiliated with and does not purport to own or control any third-party content linked herein.
Copyright © 2026 InProved Pte Ltd (UEN 201616594C, PSPM license PS20190001819)